seeking a researcher for an engaged research project on infection disease

(Apply here: https://jobs.tufts.edu/jobs/17901?lang=en-us. I can address questions, and this person will report to me.)

Tufts’ Collaborative for Emerging Infectious Diseases and Response (CEIDR) seeks a Researcher to support a transdisciplinary research (TDR) project on an infectious disease, probably monkeypox. In TDR, a team from a range of academic disciplines and community members contribute to the research. The mission of CEIDR is to develop integrative and transdisciplinary research efforts to study emerging pathogens and design equitable responses to improve health and social outcomes and mitigate the negative impacts of infectious diseases. In this instance, Tufts students enrolled in a special course will play a significant role in the TDR project.  

The Researcher will be located in The Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life, which prepares Tufts students to become active citizens and community leaders and conducts research on civic engagement.      

                                 
What You’ll Do

This is a part-time position at 17.5 hours per week. This is also a 1-year limited term position. 

The Researcher will staff, support, and help organize a transdisciplinary research team on a specific topic (likely, monkeypox). Engaging with a team with diverse perspectives to jointly define research questions and co-create knowledge and solutions is a powerful approach to highly complex and interconnected societal challenges and is designed to produce responses that are tailored for maximum acceptance and effectiveness. A research committee is already in place that includes experts in public health, community health, global health, health policy, molecular biology, and infectious disease (zoonotic and human). Members of this committee will mentor the chosen candidate, providing opportunities for first-author publications and collaborations.

In spring 2023, the Researcher will lead a group of Tufts students who will also participate in the project as part of a credit-bearing course. The Researcher will also work with appropriate community partners (to be named) who will be co-researchers in the project. By the end of the year, the whole team will likely prepare a large external grant proposal to support future work; helping with that proposal will be part of the Researcher’s duties.

The Researcher will report to the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at Tisch College. The individual may also affiliate with Tufts Arts & Sciences, Engineering, Friedman, Medical, Dental or Veterinary schools, as appropriate. 

An application should include:   

  • A cover letter describing previous achievements, making the connection between the mission of the project and your research interests and professional goals, any teaching, mentoring and/or service activities that have supported a culture of diversity, equity and inclusion (maximum 2 pages)
  • CV including a list of relevant publications
  • Copy of writing sample, and/or academic transcript from undergraduate and graduate studies

Candidates from diverse backgrounds are encouraged to apply.                                                  

What We’re Looking For

Basic Requirements:

  • Doctoral or Master’s degree in a relevant discipline.
  • Candidates should have strong communication, facilitation, and leadership skills.
  • Experience with development and implementation of a course syllabus.
  • Ability to build and maintain relationships with faculty, institutional and community partners throughout the research process.

Preferred Qualifications: 

  • Knowledge of transdisciplinary research (TDR)

explaining Ostrom

Elinor Ostrom (1933-2012) was a political scientist at Indiana University and a leader of the intellectual movement informally known as the Bloomington School. She won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2009 and was a MacArthur “genius” Fellow and president of the American Political Science Association. For me, she was a major inspiration, and I find that I have mentioned or discussed her in 142 blog posts over the years. I also summarize her work in chapter 3 of What Should We Do? A Theory of Civic Life (2022).

I have now recorded two videos to introduce all of her major ideas, as I see them. I discuss her basic principles in Part I (17 minutes) and how to apply her ideas in Part II (11 minutes). These are free for anyone to use and are embedded in this public website about what we should learn to be effective citizens.

the history of the phrase “the West”

Nowadays, the word “West” has political and racialized meanings. It can, for example, refer to the wealthy (and predominantly white) countries that are confronting Russia over Ukraine. It is used to condemn or to praise–sometimes with the same target. For instance, Paolo Freire is variously described as a critic of Western pedagogy, as an anti-colonial thinker who had been appropriated and mischaracterized by Western scholars, and as someone who would impose Western pedagogical ideas (such as child-centered learning) on the Global South. I think the term itself is meaningless, although imperialism names an evil.

The distinction between Christianity and other religions is old but was not associated with a compass direction until the Renaissance. After all, Jesus lived in the eastern Mediterranean; a great medieval Muslim nation had an Atlantic coastline. By the time that white racism developed (but not before then), most of the world’s Christians were white and most whites were Christian. Europe was by then the Christian heartland. There were people of color and non-Christians to the south, west, and east, but Europeans came to dominate and heavily settle the New World. This is presumably the seed of the idea that “The West” is a distinctive part of the globe, lying roughly between Vienna and San Francisco.

In medieval English, the word “west” referred to a direction. The medieval and Renaissance examples in the Oxford English Dictionary that imply a portion of the globe are concerned with the distinctions between the Eastern and Western Roman Empires (as political units) or with Catholic versus Orthodox Christianity. The first fairly clear reference to “The West” as white-dominant is in Tennyson: “He never yet had set his daughter forth / Here in the woman-markets of the west, / Where our Caucasians let themselves be sold” (Aylmer’s Field, 1864). Even in this case, it’s not obvious to me that “the west” means a part of the earth as opposed to a region of England (that “land of hops and poppy-mingled corn”). According to the OED, it’s not until Kipling (1892) that East and West are clearly distinguished on cultural or racial grounds.

Likewise, the phrase “Western world” is first attested in the 16th century, but it generally refers to the Americas in contrast to Europe, e.g., in 1787: “Sir Walter Raleigh, so remarkable for his penetration in foreseeing the consequences of the Western World to Europe.” The OED’s first use of the phrase to refer to Europe and regions heavily settled by Europeans comes in 1894 (from The Princeton College Bulletin): “There has grown up by a process of evolution a type of culture in the Western world which we call classical education.”

“Westerner” meant someone from the West of England–or from the western region of another country, such as the United States–until ca. 1857, when W. C. Milne wrote, “There is no fear … of any Westerner starving at Shanghai.”

As I’ve explored before, the word “culture” becomes a count noun around the same time. Previously, culture had been a virtue or quality of any individual who was cultured. By 1900, one could describe “a culture” as having characteristics that distinguished it from others. Then it became possible to use the phrase “European culture” and to associate it with “the West.”

This happened just as European imperialism reached its apogee, and the power of white Christians seemed unchallengeable. But then Europe descended into the madness of World War I and experienced revolutions. It became common to bemoan–or to celebrate–the “decline of the West.”

As a few examples of that discussion: Spengler claimed that democracy and money were corrupting what he called “the West.” Ludwig von Mises thought that markets were definitive of the West but endangered by socialism. (“The idea of liberty is and has always been peculiar to the West. What separates East and West is first of all the fact that the peoples of the East never conceived the idea of liberty.”) Gandhi may not have said, when he was asked what he thought of Western civilization, that “it would be a very good idea” (or if he did say it, he may have been joking). But he wrote in Hind Swaraj that “one effort is required, and that is to drive out Western civilization.”

Nearly a century later, it would be helpful if we stopped using the phrase “the West” at all.

See also don’t name things Western but call out imperialism;  to whom do the ancient Greeks belong?Jesus was a person of coloravoiding the labels of East and Westwhen East and West were oneon modernity and the distinction between East and Westtwo cheers for the West; a mistaken view of culture; individuals in cultures: the concept of an idiodictuon etc..

civic education in Russia

The Russian Education Ministry recently unveiled new curricular units for grades 1-11 under the label of “Talking About What is Important: Our Country is Russia.” I learned about the curriculum from this article in Meduza, but the magic of Google Translate allowed me to read the whole thing in English. It’s fascinating as a window into Russian pedagogy and state values, as well as a dim reflection of practices that some Americans would advocate–or even use already–for our children.

Perhaps the creepiest part comes in the Materials for Grades 5-7. Students compete in teams to answer quiz questions, such as “What is the tallest building in Europe?” (answer: Lakhta Center, St. Petersburg) and “What order do the colors appear in the Russian flag?”

At this point, the lesson plan says:

Teacher: While the results of the game are being summed up, I want to note that regardless of points scored, you are all great, because you know a lot about geography, history and culture of our country. …

We see manifestations of genuine patriotism even today, above all during the special military operation. Its launch on February 24 of this year was announced by the President of Russia V.V. Putin. In his speech, the President noted: “Circumstances require us to take decisive and immediate actions. The People’s Republic of Donbas turned to Russia with a request for help.” Among the goals of a special military operation are to protect the population of Donbas, subjected to bullying and harassment by the Kyiv regime, to disarm Ukraine, and to prevent the deployment of NATO military bases. The Russian armed forces, together with the forces of the DPR and LPR, are actively working to achieve these goals. Huge military and other assistance of the collective West to the Ukrainian authorities is prolonging the fighting and increases the number of victims of the operation.

Over the past months, we have learned the names of our heroes, Russian patriots. Here are some more facts. Captain Alexander Romanov during the battle discovered a group of Ukrainian nationalists and decided to push them into the minefield. As a result of the operation, the nationalists surrendered, Captain Romanov personally neutralized 26 men. Thanks to the successful operation, Russian troops occupied the salient without losses.

(The list of heroic feats continues.)

Another snippet, this one from grades 3-5, provides a portrait of a Russian classroom as the Ministry imagines it:

Teacher: Today let’s think together again about what it means to love your Motherland, and how to learn it. For this it is important to answer the question “What do we call the Motherland?”. It is both simple and very complex issue. Of course, the Motherland for us is our country Russia. And what else? I would like to hear your answers.

Sample answers of children: “The motherland is also the people who live in our country, and our family, and the place where we were born, and the culture”.

Teacher: Let’s listen to the lyrics of the song “Where the Motherland Begins” by Veniamin Basner to the words of Mikhail Matusovsky. …

I had the opportunity to work with Ukrainian teachers in Kyiv in 2017, so I knew their national curriculum at the time. It had patriotic elements, but also democratic, classically liberal, and cosmopolitan aspects, and it seemed to align with guidance from the Council of Europe. I did not see anything about democracy or individual rights in the new Russian materials, even as lip-service.

We must teach students about politics, government, history, and social issues–to equip them to participate on an equal footing. However, civic education is always dangerous, because the government is able to compel children to learn about itself. I realize that conservative critics believe that American public schools teach youth to support expansive state policies and bureaucracies that they oppose. For me, a greater risk is a curriculum that idolizes the nation and its existing system and policies–much like the Kremlin’s. These disagreements are inevitable and even healthy. The best we can do is to have an ongoing, critical, diverse, deliberative, and influential public debate about what students should learn, so that this crucial question is not settled by politicians alone.