Influenced
by Harry Boyte, I believe
that opportunities for people to contribute public goods have shrunk
over the last century. Government is increasingly "rational"
(in Weber’s sense): this means that important functions are divided
into specialized tasks and assigned to experts, who are given minimal
discretion. The government as a whole does good, but relatively few
people can gain deep personal satisfaction from their own public service.
Meanwhile, the private sector grows ever more efficient and competitive.
As a result, there are few niches for people who want to work in business
for partly public purposes. (An example would be the demise of the
old publishing houses, which were "for profit," but not
very efficient about it; editors saw themselves mainly as friends
of literature.)
The loss of opportunities for public work is unfortunate, because
we waste the talents and energies of millions of citizens. It also
means that people lose the very special satisfaction that comes from
creating public goods. And I believe that it partly explains the decline
of other forms of citizenship, such as voting and reading the newspaper.
People who don’t make public goods are less likely to participate
in other ways.
Now we face a national crisis, terrorism, and it seems worthwhile
to look for opportunities to involve many citizens in significant
public work. Only an expert on national security could tell us what
jobs people are equipped to do. Spying on our fellow citizens is not
a good idea (the damage to privacy and due process is too great).
Thus I offer some very ill-informed ideas about some other roles that
citizens might play. My main goal here is to provoke others to think
of better ideas:
- The military personnel who are doing peace-keeping and nation-building
work in Iraq are creating public goods. They are creative and improvisational,
in the best tradition of public work. We should celebrate them as
good citizens, and recognize the (non-martial) virtues that they are
displaying—virtues that we also need in civilian life. Everyone
wants Iraqis to play a larger role; but for the time being, let’s
recognize that Americans are exemplifying citizenship in Iraq. (This
is true even if the invasion was ill-advised or even illegal.) We
also need ways to help veterans of Iraq to use their skills back home.
- Citizens could deliberately learn strategic languages, such as Pashto
or Malay; read newspapers and websites in those languages; and then
post their own translations of key excerpts online. Their audience
would be US experts in foreign affairs, and also fellow citizens who
are trying to understand a complex world. Clearly, volunteers would
have to learn these languages from someone. This suggests
a great opportunity to employ immigrants as language teachers.
- Citizens could assist in planning the emergency evacuation of major
cities. Big highways would be quickly jammed after a catastophe, so
we need to figure out how to move large numbers of people through
side streets. Citizens could collect data on the capacity of each
street segment to carry heavy traffic. Fed into GIS software, these
data would show alternative evacuation routes.
- There are many ways for citizens to work together to conserve oil,
thereby reducing our dependence on middle eastern sources.
I’m sure there are better ideas than these. It’s a shame that our
creativity and dedication were not tapped soon after 9/11, when
people were desperate to serve. But it’s not too late.
How about expanding the sister city idea to focus on the Muslim world? US participants could design 2 week trips for visitors here, exploring themes of religious pluralism, education, family life, local politics, economic opportunity. I don’t really know how the sister city program worked, mostly with European cities I think.
Next, classrooms in Europe, US and the Muslim world could link for fellowship and academic resources. Are colleges doing this yet in language, politics or anthropology classes?