Monthly Archives: June 2007

on Providence

(Providence, RI) I don’t come here very often, but I’m developing a habit of ruminating about America whenever I walk around this city’s historic core. Not only did Providence play an important role in our founding, but there is something classically American about the old houses near Brown University. They were built in the same style that was current in Britain at the time–“Federalist” is just the American version of “Regency”–but their white picket fences and front lawns belong only in this country. Their classical details evoke the ideals of a young commercial republic.

It’s an ambiguous legacy. I have previously described John Brown, who built one of those fine houses and helped to found Brown University as well as the United States, and who could rightly be called “slave trader … and patriot.” It was one of his descendants, I believe, who built the John Carter Brown Library over whose ionic marble lintel is chiseled the word “Americana.” As I walk, I think of two other Providence figures: Roger Williams, prophet of peace and religious toleration and founder of the city, and Ruth Simmons, the current President of Brown University. Dr. Simmons, 12th child of Texas sharecroppers, leads the institution that John Brown founded with slave money.

This time, I arrived in Providence on a Peter Pan bus that carried its share of lost souls. In the bus depot, people looked strung out. I had come from an intense conference in which many participants were alarmed and furious about the state of our democracy. Even before the conference, I had been thinking about urban America and the startling evidence of exclusion. People whose ancestors came to America as John Brown’s property are now filling our state prisons literally by the million. No other country imprisons so many.

Yet Brown and its surroundings represent freedom and excellence. Those buildings are very fine; and quite diverse people walk among them, use their resources, and even find distinguished places within them. I feel more alienated than usual from “Americana,” and that feeling is mixed with nostalgia, because once I had a less complicated relationship to the Republic and its early history. But I refuse to give up on the ideals of Roger Williams and Ruth Simmons or the beautiful communities that Americans have–sometimes–built.

new CIRCLE website

(Providence, RI): I’m in this lovely city for meetings with professors who conduct community-based research. Meanwhile, CIRCLE has entered the 21st century by rebuilding our website so that it runs off a database and is no longer simply a set of hand-built html web pages. Every document that we have published is now entry in the database, and it’s much easier to find things. Lacking a budget for web design, we did this with in-house staff time (thank you, colleagues) and very cheap WordPress software. WordPress was built for bloggers but is flexible. In the place of blog entries, we enter working papers, fact sheets, press releases, and the like.

the power of consensus

(Portsmouth, NH) I’ve been in New Hampshire for a meeting to help launch something called the Democracy Imperative. The participants are a mix of professors, college administrators, and activists based outside of universities. It is fairly diverse in terms of race and ethnicity, training, and profession. I knew about 10 of the 34 participants quite well before I came, and I knew everyone at least a little by the end of the second day. There are many overlapping networks and mutual friends.

It has been an intense meeting with much positive emotion and collaborative work. By the end of the second full day, the room was covered with big sheets of handwritten notes, action steps, mission statements, concerns and hopes. As is common at such meetings, we went around the large room and asked everyone to reflect on the meeting so far, in preparation for the third and final day. One after another, people spoke of their gratitude for the gathering, their commitment to the common cause, and their enthusiasm for the process. It struck me that if any participants had been disgruntled–or even a little dissatisfied–they would have been hard pressed to express those concerns, once 10 or 20 other people had spoken in emotional and positive terms.

Even though participants are not required, paid, or otherwise rewarded for attending, they have come under intense pressure to pledge support for the group. That pressure comes from the group itself. One could view such pressure as oppressive–as the tyranny of the majority. But participants in our meeting have the option of quiet, polite exit after the conference disbands. Thus one can view consensus as a form of democratic pressure or power that elicits contributions to a collective enterprise without threats or payments. (Jenny Mansbridge’s Beyond Adversary Democracy is the classic text on such power.)

John Donne, The Ecstacy

(In Portsmouth, New Hampshire) In a review by John Carey, I came upon a strange and wonderful John Donne poem, “The Ecstacy.” Here it is in the left column with my literal paraphrase to the right. (Literal interpretation seems to me a necessary first step in understanding metaphysical poetry, or any dense verse.)

THE ECSTACY

by John Donne

WHERE, like a pillow on a bed,

    A pregnant bank swell’d up, to rest

The violet’s reclining head,

Sat we two, one another’s best.

1. Two people (the narrator and a woman; see 4) who are fond of one another sit on a flowery bank.

Our hands were firmly cemented

    By a fast balm, which thence did spring;

Our eye-beams twisted, and did thread

Our eyes upon one double string.

2. They hold hands and look into one another’s eyes.

So to engraft our hands, as yet

    Was all the means to make us one;

And pictures in our eyes to get

Was all our propagation.

3. They unite by holding hands and visualizing the same object (possibly the propagation of the violet mentioned below: 10)

As, ‘twixt two equal armies, Fate

    Suspends uncertain victory,

Our souls–which to advance their state,

Were gone out–hung ‘twixt her and me.

4. Their souls meet in between their bodies and …

And whilst our souls negotiate there,

    We like sepulchral statues lay ;

All day, the same our postures were,

And we said nothing, all the day.

5. negotiate (possibly about whether to have sex; see 13) while they lie still and silent for the whole day.

If any, so by love refined,

    That he soul’s language understood,

And by good love were grown all mind,

Within convenient distance stood,

6. If a third person who fully understood love stood nearby, …

He–though he knew not which soul spake,

    Because both meant, both spake the same–

Might thence a new concoction take,

And part far purer than he came.

7. he could benefit morally from what they say in one voice, which is:

This ecstasy doth unperplex

    (We said) and tell us what we love;

We see by this, it was not sex;

We see, we saw not, what did move:

8. “This state of fusion shows us that we did not love sex or bodily motion, …

But as all several souls contain

    Mixture of things they know not what,

Love these mix’d souls doth mix again,

And makes both one, each this, and that.

9. but the union of two souls that were never self-sufficent.

A single violet transplant,

    The strength, the colour, and the size–

All which before was poor and scant–

Redoubles still, and multiplies.

10. If you replant a single flower (perhaps the violet in 1), it can grow and multiply.

When love with one another so

    Interanimates two souls,

That abler soul, which thence doth flow,

Defects of loneliness controls.

11. [Likewise,] when two souls are in love, they create one better soul.

We then, who are this new soul, know,

    Of what we are composed, and made,

For th’ atomies of which we grow

Are souls, whom no change can invade.

12. We are this new soul, composed of our own original souls as atoms.

But, O alas! so long, so far,

    Our bodies why do we forbear?

They are ours, though not we; we are

Th’ intelligences, they the spheres.

13. But why do we shun our bodies?

We owe them thanks, because they thus

    Did us, to us, at first convey,

Yielded their senses’ force to us,

Nor are dross to us, but allay.

14. It was through our bodily sensations that we learned to love; bodies are not superfluous but are mixed with souls into an alloy.

On man heaven’s influence works not so,

    But that it first imprints the air;

For soul into the soul may flow,

Though it to body first repair.

15. Just as heaven (i.e., stars or angels) must influence us through the physical medium of air, so a soul communicates with a soul by means of the body.

As our blood labours to beget

    Spirits, as like souls as it can;

Because such fingers need to knit

That subtle knot, which makes us man;

16. We struggle bodily to create images that are like souls (referring either to the common thought mentioned in 3 or to conceiving a child).

So must pure lovers’ souls descend

    To affections, and to faculties,

Which sense may reach and apprehend,

Else a great prince in prison lies.

17. Thus we must descend from thought to our senses …

To our bodies turn we then, that so

    Weak men on love reveal’d may look;

Love’s mysteries in souls do grow,

But yet the body is his book.

18. and appreciate one another’s bodies.”

And if some lover, such as we,

Have heard this dialogue of one,

Let him still mark us, he shall see

Small change when we’re to bodies gone

19. And if the third person stayed to watch us have sex, he would still think that we were spiritually united.

The movement of the poem is from static bodies upward to thoughts and then back into animated bodies. At the beginning, “we” are two separate motionless physical objects (we “sat”; we “lay”). In the middle verses, “we” are one disembodied consciousness, addressing a passive third party and deciding whether to reenter our bodies. At the end, body and soul are one.

I read the poem as an argument by a male narrator to a female lover that they should have sex, because it will be like “ecstasy” (a religious “state of rapture that stupefies the body while the soul contemplates divine things”). In that case, the claim that both souls speak as one in the middle of the poem is more of a hope or a lure than a fact. There is some irony in the poem–a gap between what the narrator means and what he says, and perhaps also between how he sees himself and how we are supposed to see him. But the irony hardly cancels the sensuality of this poem that begins with pregnant swelling banks and ends with souls gone to bodies in plain view of an approving observer.

portrait of the inner city

(Manchester, NH) A study by Lois M. Quinn (pdf) dramatizes the suffering of poor urban Americans in 2007–and exemplifies useful scholarship at an urban public institution. On behalf of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee’s Employment and Training Institute, Quinn describes one zip code, 53206, where:

  • 62% of the men in their early thirties are now or have been in state prisons;
  • The number of incarcerations for “drug offenses only” has risen by 493% since 1993 (but more incarcerations are for assault than for drug offenses);
  • Women in their 30s outnumber men by 3 to 2;
  • Housing prices have risen by at least 50% in the last three years;
  • The average income of tax-filers (a small proportion of the population) was $17,547; 90 percent of these individuals are single parents;
  • Two thirds of consumer spending is outside the zip code;
  • Ninety percent of people who declare income from working in the zip code live outside it;
  • 56 percent of people who declare income from working in the zip code are white even though 97 percent of the residents are African American; and
  • More than three quarters of loans to homeowners are subprime or high interest.
  • From Census data, we can also tell that this zip code has:

  • a very high ratio of children to adults;
  • a median household income of about $20,000 with a median of 3.1 people in each household;
  • housing stock that is mostly at least 55-65 years old;
  • almost no immigrants.
  • Needless to say, there are many other zip codes like Milwaukee 53206.

    I am all for Asset-Based Community Development, building on indigenous resources, local leadership, and culture-change. I am suspicious that pouring in money could solve poverty by itself, because the money is usually misapplied by powerful outsiders. However, civic, participatory, grassroots strategies need to work for people in places like 53206–and quickly. That is the test of whether they are worth anything at all.