{"id":5405,"date":"2008-03-20T10:29:42","date_gmt":"2008-03-20T10:29:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=5405"},"modified":"2008-03-20T10:29:42","modified_gmt":"2008-03-20T10:29:42","slug":"part-of-the-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=5405","title":{"rendered":"part of the problem"},"content":{"rendered":"

I generally don’t like to quote at length from prominent blogs, but I can’t improve on this reaction by Jay Rosen<\/a>:<\/p>\n

I was watching CNN for Obama’s speech. Moments after it concluded Wolf Blitzer was asked to tell us what he heard in it. Wolf’s ear is the big ear for the Best Political Team on Television, according to CNN. So he went first. And according to Blitzer, Obama’s speech boils down to a “pre-emptive strike” against various attacks on the way: videos, ads, and news controversies that are sure to keep Reverend Jeremiah Wright and “race” in play as issues in the campaign. (I don’t have his exact words; if someone out there does, ping me.)<\/p>\n

Wasn’t the speech about that very pattern?<\/p>\n

This is the style of analysis–and the level of thought–we have become miserably utterly used to, especially from Blitzer, but also many others on TV: everything is a move in the game of getting elected, and it’s our job in political television to explain to you, the slightly clueless viewer at home, what the special tactics in this case are, then to estimate whether they will work.<\/p>\n

That Blitzer, offered the first word on that speech, did the savvier-than-thou, horse race thing tells you about his priorities (mistakenly “static,” as Obama said about Wright) and his imaginative range as an interpreter of politics (pretty close to zero.)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Compare Wolf to active, thoughtful citizens who care:<\/p>\n

“The Rev. Joel Hunter, senior pastor of a mostly white evangelical church of about 12,000 in Central Florida … said <\/a>the Obama speech led to a series of conversations Wednesday morning with his staff members. “We want for there to be healing and reconciliation, but unless it\u2019s raised in a very public manner, it\u2019s tough for us in our regular conversation to raise it.”<\/p>\n

Julie Fanselow:<\/a> “Time and again Tuesday, speakers at Take Back America and writers on blogs like The Super Spade and Booker Rising and Pam’s House Blend echoed and dissected and even wept over<\/em> what Obama had said in Philadelphia.”<\/p>\n

Rich Harwood reflects <\/a>on what we should do when someone (such as Rev. Wright) “cross[es] the line of politeness and rupture[s] norms of give-and-take.” We should, says Rich, “step forward and renounce them in ways that reflect the kind of public life and politics we seek to create. Let us take in the fullness of their argument and respond in kind – with clarity, forthrightness, and strength of conviction, even love. I do not suggest that anyone should back down, but neither do I advocate a slash and burn response that poisons the very public square we wish to invigorate.”<\/p>\n

Less favorable to Obama, but equally responsible and deliberative, is Bill Galston’s take<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I generally don’t like to quote at length from prominent blogs, but I can’t improve on this reaction by Jay Rosen: I was watching CNN for Obama’s speech. Moments after it concluded Wolf Blitzer was asked to tell us what he heard in it. Wolf’s ear is the big ear for the Best Political Team […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5405","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-press-criticism"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5405","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5405"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5405\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5405"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5405"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5405"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}