{"id":5260,"date":"2007-07-24T09:36:23","date_gmt":"2007-07-24T09:36:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=5260"},"modified":"2007-07-24T09:36:23","modified_gmt":"2007-07-24T09:36:23","slug":"public-participation-in-grantmaking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=5260","title":{"rendered":"public participation in grantmaking"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Led by Cindy Gibson, a group of us has helped the Case Foundation to develop an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.casefoundation.org\/make-it-your-own\/awards\">innovative grant competition<\/a> that involves online voting about which proposals to fund. The Chronicle of Philanthropy ran a story about this competition that, as <a href=\"http:\/\/citizenpost.blogspot.com\/2007\/07\/can-philanthropy-be-citizen-centered.html\">Cindy says<\/a>, was &#8220;fairly balanced and thorough.&#8221; However, it put most of the focus on the voting part of the competition. A vote can be &#8220;gamed&#8221; or manipulated in various ways. It doesn&#8217;t necessarily reflect a group&#8217;s judgment, nor does it necessarily increase accountability to the public (since the whole public won&#8217;t vote).<\/p>\n<p>I like the Case Foundation&#8217;s experiment with voting because it&#8217;s part of a broader foray into public participation. There will not just be a vote, but also a structured discussion. Crucially, the proposals will be evaluated for how much they enhance public voice. As in the formal political system, granting people a vote is a gesture of respect; it says that power will not be monopolized at the center. But the vote is insufficient to achieve public judgment. If anything, the voting portion of the Case Foundation&#8217;s new program is valuable as a symbol of a deeper commitment. Case is experimenting with a new relationship between the foundation (whose funds are tax-exempt by law) and the public.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Led by Cindy Gibson, a group of us has helped the Case Foundation to develop an innovative grant competition that involves online voting about which proposals to fund. The Chronicle of Philanthropy ran a story about this competition that, as Cindy says, was &#8220;fairly balanced and thorough.&#8221; However, it put most of the focus on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}