{"id":5099,"date":"2006-11-28T07:20:44","date_gmt":"2006-11-28T07:20:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=5099"},"modified":"2006-11-28T07:20:44","modified_gmt":"2006-11-28T07:20:44","slug":"states-and-markets-the-case-of-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=5099","title":{"rendered":"states and markets (the case of India)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I could write a long post criticizing &#8220;neoliberalism&#8221; for widening gaps between rich and poor, undermining local cultures, damaging the biosphere, and restricting the sovereignty of democratic governments. I&#8217;d vote for the democratic left if, for example, I lived in Latin America. Yet I&#8217;m haunted by the example of India, where people who shared my values set the nation&#8217;s course from 1949 until the mid-1980s. Nehru and his fellow leaders of the Congress Party were democratic, civil libertarian, secular, nonviolent, pluralist, deliberative, and egalitarian. Opposing &#8220;globalization&#8221; before that word was coined, they tried to make India self-reliant and to help the least advantaged of their compatriots. It is at least possible that their well-intentioned policies caused hundreds of millions of people to live shorter, harsher, and narrower lives than they might have otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>The following passage from Shashi Tharoor&#8217;s <em>India: From Midnight to the Millennium <\/em>(pp. 166-8) has stuck with me for several years:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The government&#8217;s indifferent attitude [in the 1970s] was epitomized by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi&#8217;s communications minister, C.M. Stephen, who declared in Parliament, in response to questions decrying the rampant telephone breakdowns in the country, that telephones were a luxury, not a right, and that any Indian who was not satisfied with his telephone service could return his phone&#8211;since there was an eight-year waiting list of people seeking this supposedly inadequate product.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Stephen&#8217;s statement captured perfectly everything that was wrong about the government&#8217;s attitude. It was ignorant (he clearly had no idea of the colossal socioeconomic losses caused by poor communications), wrong-headed (he saw a practical problem only as an opportunity to score a political point), unconstructive (responding to complaints by seeking a solution apparently did not occur to him), self-righteous (the socialist cant about telephones being a luxury, not a right), complacent(taking pride in a waiting list the existence of which should have been a source of shame &#8230;), unresponsive (feeling no obligation to provide a service in return for the patience, and fees, of the country&#8217;s telephone subscribers), and insulting.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Although some blame for this unresponsiveness should be assigned directly to Mrs. Gandhi and her ministers, the example surely illustrates a more general problem. Centralized state bureaucracies that deny market preferences tend to become arrogant. Of course, mid-20th century state-socialism and neoliberalism are not our only alternatives. There are various Third Ways, including efforts to decentralize democratic governance. Nevertheless, it&#8217;s sobering to consider the enormous waste that good intentions can cause.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I could write a long post criticizing &#8220;neoliberalism&#8221; for widening gaps between rich and poor, undermining local cultures, damaging the biosphere, and restricting the sovereignty of democratic governments. I&#8217;d vote for the democratic left if, for example, I lived in Latin America. Yet I&#8217;m haunted by the example of India, where people who shared my [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5099"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5099\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}