{"id":4625,"date":"2005-01-04T09:04:43","date_gmt":"2005-01-04T09:04:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4625"},"modified":"2005-01-04T09:04:43","modified_gmt":"2005-01-04T09:04:43","slug":"a-commons-taxonomy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4625","title":{"rendered":"a commons taxonomy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A commons (or, as the Brits say, &#8220;a common&#8221;) is a shared<\/p>\n<p>resource. Some common resources are made by the group that shares them; others<\/p>\n<p>are found in nature.* Meanwhile, resources can be shared in a variety of ways.<\/p>\n<p>In a libertarian commons, no one owns the assets at all; since there are no<\/p>\n<p>property rights, everyone shares. In a communitarian commons, a tight group<\/p>\n<p>of people owns a resource jointly. Membership may come as a birthright, as in<\/p>\n<p>peasant villages. Members can&#8217;t sell or trade their rights. Some such communities<\/p>\n<p>are very stable and efficient because there are thick bonds of trust and obligation<\/p>\n<p>within the group. In a voluntary\/associational commons, membership is a matter<\/p>\n<p>of choice. One can join and quit at will (although joining may be subject to<\/p>\n<p>the group&#8217;s approval). Whether it&#8217;s an informal network or a registered 501(c)3,<\/p>\n<p>the association jointly owns certain assets. But associations differ from corporations<\/p>\n<p>in that ownership is not divisible, proportional to investment, or purchasable.<\/p>\n<p>If you quit the association, you simply renounce your stake. Finally, in a democratic<\/p>\n<p>commons, the government owns and manages assets and holds them in public trust.<\/p>\n<p>Combining the &#8220;made&#8221;\/&#8221;found&#8221; distinction with the type of governance yields<\/p>\n<p>the following taxonomy: <\/p>\n<table width=\"71%\" border=\"2\" cellspacing=\"2\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>&#8220;found&#8221;<\/td>\n<td>&#8220;made&#8221;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>libertarian<\/td>\n<td>the oceans, the ozone layer; works of art from the past that are now in<\/p>\n<p>the public domain<\/td>\n<td>the Internet; open-source software; science, when it reflects <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scicom.lth.se\/fmet\/cudoos.html\">R.K. Merton&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>CUDOS norms<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>communitarian<\/td>\n<td>coastal fishing villages and other communities that subsist on natural<\/p>\n<p>resources; very conservative religious communities<\/td>\n<td>rural communities that create and share common pool resources, such as<\/p>\n<p>Alpine meadows and water districts; public spaces that belong to tight communities rather than<\/p>\n<p>democratic states <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>voluntary\/associational <\/td>\n<td>preservationist organizations that are stewards of some natural or cultural<\/p>\n<p>heritage<\/td>\n<td>clubs, religious congregations, political parties<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>democratic<\/td>\n<td>oil reserves, national forests<\/td>\n<td>public spaces such as squares and museums; laws, legislative bodies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p> All of these forms have advantages and disadvantages. However, I am especially<\/p>\n<p>enthusiastic about voluntary\/associational commons that make goods. They are<\/p>\n<p>the heart of Tocquevillian civil society, in my view. Communitarian commons<\/p>\n<p>are too restrictive&#8211;and libertarian commons, too fragile&#8211;for my taste. In a<\/p>\n<p>lot of my <a href=\"http:\/\/www.peterlevine.ws\/Internet%20work.htm\">scholarly and practical work<\/a>, I&#8217;m trying to give the libertarian commons<\/p>\n<p>known as the Internet more of an associational feel. <\/p>\n<p>*The &#8220;made&#8221;\/&#8221;found&#8221; distinction<\/p>\n<p>is really a matter of degree and can certainly be debated in particular cases.<\/p>\n<p>Simon Schama, in <i>Landscape and Memory<\/i>, argues that almost all &#8220;natural&#8221; landscapes<\/p>\n<p>have actually been deeply influenced by people. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A commons (or, as the Brits say, &#8220;a common&#8221;) is a shared resource. Some common resources are made by the group that shares them; others are found in nature.* Meanwhile, resources can be shared in a variety of ways. In a libertarian commons, no one owns the assets at all; since there are no property [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-internet-and-public-issues"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4625\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}