{"id":4389,"date":"2004-02-09T16:08:33","date_gmt":"2004-02-09T16:08:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4389"},"modified":"2004-02-09T16:08:33","modified_gmt":"2004-02-09T16:08:33","slug":"bush-on-the-budget","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4389","title":{"rendered":"Bush on the budget"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When he interviewed the president on Sunday, Tim Russert spent most of the time asking about Iraq; this part of the interview has also attracted the most attention from pundits. But I was most struck by the following <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A23218-2004Feb8_5.html\">comment<\/a>: &#8220;BUSH: If you look at the appropriations bills that were passed under my watch, in the last year of President Clinton, discretionary spending was up 15 percent, and ours have steadily declined.&#8221; The Heritage Foundation provides a clear <a href=\"http:\/\/www.heritage.org\/research\/features\/budgetchartbook\/charts_S\/s8.html\">graph <\/a>of annual changes in discretionary spending, which shows that growth in the discretionary budget never exceeded 2% under Clinton. By my calculation, there was a 10% increase in 2002 and a 14% increase in 2003 . (I&#8217;m using this <a href=\"http:\/\/frwebgate6.access.gpo.gov\/cgi-bin\/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=35845329642+6+0+0&#038;WAISaction=retrieve\">table<\/a> for those years). You get slightly <a href=\"http:\/\/us.cnn.com\/2004\/ALLPOLITICS\/01\/06\/elec04.prez.bush.spending.ap\/\">different results<\/a> if you measure &#8220;discretionary spending&#8221; differently, but the basic pattern is clear. Spending inched up under Clinton and soared under Bush. The president is flat wrong. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nHe then says: &#8220;And the other thing that I think it&#8217;s important for people who watch the expenditures side of the equation is to understand we&#8217;re at war, Tim, and any time you commit your troops into harm&#8217;s way, they must have the best equipment, the best training and the best possible pay. That&#8217;s where &#8212; we owe it to their loved ones.&#8221; But the increase in <i>non-defense <\/i>discretionary spending was 5% this year, about twice the annual rate in the Clinton years.<\/p>\n<p>Will conservatives make Bush pay a political price for increasing federal domestic spending? The only way they can exact a serious penalty is by staying home in November&#8211;and they <i>should <\/i>do that, since the administration has completely betrayed conservative values. However, I suspect they&#8217;ll come out for the president. Liberals may attack Bush, but with one hand tied behind their backs, because they don&#8217;t see discretionary spending as a problem and won&#8217;t promise to cut it. Thus I predict that the president will still be getting away with false statements about his own budget six months from now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When he interviewed the president on Sunday, Tim Russert spent most of the time asking about Iraq; this part of the interview has also attracted the most attention from pundits. But I was most struck by the following comment: &#8220;BUSH: If you look at the appropriations bills that were passed under my watch, in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4389"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4389\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}