{"id":4290,"date":"2003-09-19T11:46:33","date_gmt":"2003-09-19T11:46:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4290"},"modified":"2003-09-19T11:46:33","modified_gmt":"2003-09-19T11:46:33","slug":"the-many-bachs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4290","title":{"rendered":"the many Bachs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For some reason, I was thinking about all the dramatically different<\/p>\n<p>ways in which people have seen and admired J.S. Bach since his own day.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>There is Bach as a virtuouso improviser, the man who could sit\n<p>down at a keyboard and swiftly invent a multi-part fugue on any<\/p>\n<p>theme. This is Bach as forerunner of a jazz musician, an exciting<\/p>\n<p>live performer.<\/li>\n<li>There is Bach as pedagogue, the man who taught three sons who\n<p>were much more successful than himself and who wrote great instructional<\/p>\n<p>works such as the &quot;Well-Tempered Clavier.&quot; These musical<\/p>\n<p>texts have been consistently consulted by composers even when Bach&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>other works were forgotten (for instance, in Mozart&#8217;s time).<\/li>\n<li>There is Bach the profound spiritual master, the Lutheran churchman,\n<p>the author of great narrative choral works such as the Passions,<\/p>\n<p>which realistically depict human emotions in relation to God&#8217;s providence.<\/p>\n<p>This is the Bach whom the Romantics admired most. They even disparaged<\/p>\n<p>the &quot;Christmas Oratorio&quot; because it recycled music from<\/p>\n<p>secular works&#8212;so it couldn&#8217;t be spiritually inspired.<\/li>\n<li>There is Bach as an anti-Romantic, an unpretentious musical worker.\n<p>Whereas Romantic musical geniuses were supposed to be free of all<\/p>\n<p>worldly motives and inspired only by Art, Bach happily turned out<\/p>\n<p>church music for every Sunday, often re-using material, borrowing<\/p>\n<p>from other sources, and making do with amateur performers. For this,<\/p>\n<p>he was admired by leftish anti-Romantics such as Paul Hindemith.<\/p>\n<p>If I recall correctly, Bertold Brecht used to call himself a <em>Schreiber<\/em>,<\/p>\n<p>not a <em>Dichter<\/em>&#8212;someone who makes his living by writing,<\/p>\n<p>not a literary Artist. The same could be said of Bach.<\/li>\n<li>There is Bach as mathematical genius, author of technically and\n<p>formally complex instrumental works, especially the &quot;Musical<\/p>\n<p>Offering,&quot; that seem as other-wordly as mathematical proofs.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>After writing a list like this, one is expected to say, &quot;Of<\/p>\n<p>course, Bach was <em>all of<\/em> these things, and that&#8217;s why he is<\/p>\n<p>so great.&quot; I&#8217;m going to be a little less predictable and say<\/p>\n<p>that Bach <em>was <\/em>all of these things, of course, but he was<\/p>\n<p>at his greatest as the composer of narrative works that were grounded<\/p>\n<p>in his understanding of human life and emotion.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For some reason, I was thinking about all the dramatically different ways in which people have seen and admired J.S. Bach since his own day. There is Bach as a virtuouso improviser, the man who could sit down at a keyboard and swiftly invent a multi-part fugue on any theme. This is Bach as forerunner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fine-arts"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4290\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}