{"id":4231,"date":"2003-06-27T15:10:34","date_gmt":"2003-06-27T15:10:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4231"},"modified":"2003-06-27T15:10:34","modified_gmt":"2003-06-27T15:10:34","slug":"asset-based-development","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4231","title":{"rendered":"asset-based development"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Terms like &quot;<a href=\"www.northwestern.edu\/ipr\/abcd.html\">Asset<\/p>\n<p>Based Community Development<\/a>&quot; and the &quot;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.search-institute.org\/\">developmental<\/p>\n<p>assets&quot;<\/a> approach to working with adolescents are extremely popular today<\/p>\n<p>in foundations, schools, and social service agencies. One could dismiss such language<\/p>\n<p>as a mere effort to sound positive and uplifting, unconnected to any substantial<\/p>\n<p>change in philosophy or methodology. But I think that would be a mistake. The<\/p>\n<p>&quot;asset-based&quot; approach (for lack of a better term) is being used by<\/p>\n<p>people who come out of the Left, and it represents a real change in their views<\/p>\n<p>and methods.<\/p>\n<p>My favorite example of the old ways is now somewhat out of<\/p>\n<p>date, but I can&#8217;t resist using it. In March 2002, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.acorn.org\">ACORN<\/a><\/p>\n<p>organized protests against federal welfare policy. The angry crowd that they had<\/p>\n<p>assembled shouted down the sole member of Congress who chose to address them,<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Charles B. Rangel of Harlem, demanding that he answer their questions and<\/p>\n<p>meet with them in New York City. One of the rally&#8217;s organizers (a Harvard graduate)<\/p>\n<p>explained: &quot;Most of the crowd are people living with the reality of fairly<\/p>\n<p>extreme poverty in their own lives, and they are rightly angry.&quot; A colleague<\/p>\n<p>added that the Administration&#8217;s welfare policies &quot;are an attack on poor families<\/p>\n<p>in America.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>The organizers of this protest apparently believed that<\/p>\n<p>they could speak for poor people, whose main need was more federal welfare spending.<\/p>\n<p>Their strategy for winning such aid was to parade welfare recipients before Congress<\/p>\n<p>and the press, emphasizing their deprivation and anger. (They also displayed the<\/p>\n<p>political naivety and weakness of these people.) The protest organizers implied<\/p>\n<p>that anyone who did not completely endorse their demands was their enemy. And<\/p>\n<p>of course they failed completely.<\/p>\n<p>An assets-based approach would look quite<\/p>\n<p>different. It would treat the welfare recipients as potentially powerful and skillful<\/p>\n<p>political actors, capable of working as peers with selected allies in Congress.<\/p>\n<p>It would also recognize their capacity to build things of value in their own communities,<\/p>\n<p>regardless of federal welfare policy. Poor people do need outside resources, both<\/p>\n<p>capital and government assistance. However, they are unlikely to get such help<\/p>\n<p>unless they have first organized themselves as a powerful political force. The<\/p>\n<p>best way to organize is to identify, advertise, and build up local assets, even<\/p>\n<p>before powerful outsiders offer aid. If residents are used to working together,<\/p>\n<p>have identified their own assets, are confident and experienced, and have created<\/p>\n<p>their own new institutions, then they can win outside support. They can also handle<\/p>\n<p>the influx of aid without being overwhelmed by corruption or manipulative outsiders.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Terms like &quot;Asset Based Community Development&quot; and the &quot;developmental assets&quot; approach to working with adolescents are extremely popular today in foundations, schools, and social service agencies. One could dismiss such language as a mere effort to sound positive and uplifting, unconnected to any substantial change in philosophy or methodology. But I think that would be [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-revitalizing-the-left"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4231\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}