{"id":4221,"date":"2003-06-13T15:21:58","date_gmt":"2003-06-13T15:21:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4221"},"modified":"2003-06-13T15:21:58","modified_gmt":"2003-06-13T15:21:58","slug":"against-starving-the-beast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4221","title":{"rendered":"against &#8220;starving the beast&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> A <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/06\/12\/opinion\/L12FRIE.html\">letter<\/p>\n<p>in yesterday&#8217;s New York Times<\/a> says:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&quot;Yes to no new<\/p>\n<p>services, and let&#8217;s get rid of some of the old ones while we&#8217;re at it. We have<\/p>\n<p>had way more than enough &quot;services&quot; for decades! It&#8217;s about time that<\/p>\n<p>somebody finally understands!<\/p>\n<p>&quot;I hope to see those bumper stickers<\/p>\n<p>in 2004. Of course, I hope that people would realize what the slogan means: a<\/p>\n<p>cut in services means a cut in expenses means a cut in government intrusion into<\/p>\n<p>our daily lives!<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Isn&#8217;t it about time that we rewarded ourselves with<\/p>\n<p>freebdom again?<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Disclaimer: the government has likely refined its<\/p>\n<p>methods of intrusion, so it could feasibly cut back and still intrude more. So<\/p>\n<p>let&#8217;s cut the budget even more and not let that happen.&quot;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p>think the writer is making a mistake, even granting his own basic values. His<\/p>\n<p>argument is: Quite apart from the pain of paying taxes, government spending is<\/p>\n<p>bad because it buys &quot;intrusion.&quot; The parts of the government that he<\/p>\n<p>presumably finds &quot;intrusive&quot; are the offices involved in regulation<\/p>\n<p>and law-enforcement: the FBI, OSHA, EPA, etc. He wants to starve these agencies<\/p>\n<p>as a way to increase personal freedom. But they are not expensive. <i>All <\/i>of<\/p>\n<p>the discretionary programs outside the Department of Defense, put together, consumed<\/p>\n<p>just 19% of the <a href=\"http:\/\/w3.access.gpo.gov\/usbudget\/fy2002\/pdf\/guide.pdf\">Federal<\/p>\n<p>Budget in 2002<\/a>, and that included entirely non-&quot;intrusive&quot; programs<\/p>\n<p>like the Weather Service and medical research. Therefore, deep cuts in federal<\/p>\n<p>spending will have to come out of Social Security (23% of the budget), Medicare<\/p>\n<p>(12%), Medicaid (7%), and other means-tested entitlements (6%). (I assume that<\/p>\n<p>Defense, at 16%, is untouchable; and the remaining 17% is interest payments and<\/p>\n<p>other madatory spending.) If anything, a cash-starved government might resort<\/p>\n<p>to <i>more<\/i> regulation, because it would need\/want to respond to social problems<\/p>\n<p>and it would find regulatory mandates cheaper than spending programs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A letter in yesterday&#8217;s New York Times says: &quot;Yes to no new services, and let&#8217;s get rid of some of the old ones while we&#8217;re at it. We have had way more than enough &quot;services&quot; for decades! It&#8217;s about time that somebody finally understands! &quot;I hope to see those bumper stickers in 2004. Of course, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-revitalizing-the-left"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4221\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}