{"id":4208,"date":"2003-05-27T10:55:35","date_gmt":"2003-05-27T10:55:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4208"},"modified":"2003-05-27T10:55:35","modified_gmt":"2003-05-27T10:55:35","slug":"a-gift-from-bill-gates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4208","title":{"rendered":"a &#8220;gift&#8221; from Bill Gates?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Microsoft is giving away free software to nonprofits<\/b>, and critics<\/p>\n<p>charge that this is a deliberate plot to undermine open-source alternatives<\/p>\n<p>that were gaining ground in the nonprofit sector. I&#8217;ll have to leave it<\/p>\n<p>to economists to decide whether Microsoft&#8217;s strategy is good or bad for<\/p>\n<p>nonprofit organizations in strictly economic terms. (Economists might<\/p>\n<p>also ask whether it is a good deal for taxpayers to let Microsoft take<\/p>\n<p>a tax deduction for donating Windows, each copy of which actually costs<\/p>\n<p>the company nothing). Likewise, I&#8217;ll have to defer to antitrust lawyers<\/p>\n<p>about whether this strategy violates laws against anti-competitive pricing.<\/p>\n<p>My concern is different from either of these. It may be that open-source<\/p>\n<p>software is good for civil society because it promotes <i>cooperation<\/p>\n<p><\/i>in the writing and improving of the code; <i>diversity<\/i> (since<\/p>\n<p>open-source products can be tailored for various purposes and produced<\/p>\n<p>by many actors); and <i>creativity <\/i> by a wide range of individuals<\/p>\n<p>and groups. Whether open-source products such as Linux actually have these<\/p>\n<p>effects is an empirical matter than needs to be assessed. I suspect, however,<\/p>\n<p>that nonprofits like to use open-source products for these reasons and<\/p>\n<p>not merely to save money. If that is true, then Microsoft&#8217;s donation is<\/p>\n<p>insidious.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Microsoft is giving away free software to nonprofits, and critics charge that this is a deliberate plot to undermine open-source alternatives that were gaining ground in the nonprofit sector. I&#8217;ll have to leave it to economists to decide whether Microsoft&#8217;s strategy is good or bad for nonprofit organizations in strictly economic terms. (Economists might also [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-internet-and-public-issues"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}