{"id":4180,"date":"2003-04-15T11:48:24","date_gmt":"2003-04-15T11:48:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4180"},"modified":"2003-04-15T11:48:24","modified_gmt":"2003-04-15T11:48:24","slug":"the-commons-common-carriers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4180","title":{"rendered":"the commons &#038; common carriers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Some people regard the <b>telephone network as a &quot;commons,&quot;<\/b><\/p>\n<p>because the telephone companies have been regulated as &quot;common carriers&quot;<\/p>\n<p>by the FCC. Today, the Commission simply <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fcc.gov\/glossary.html\">defines<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&quot;common carrier&quot; as &quot;the term used to describe a telephone<\/p>\n<p>company.&quot; But the underlying idea (which the FCC may have forgotten<\/p>\n<p>in this deregulatory era) would apply just as well to railway lines or<\/p>\n<p>postal services as to AT&amp;T. A true common carrier agrees to move any<\/p>\n<p>good, message, or person (depending on the medium) from anywhere in its<\/p>\n<p>system to anywhere else for a price that depends only on factors that<\/p>\n<p>affect its own costs, e.g., distance and weight or duration. A common<\/p>\n<p>carrier may not discriminate on the basis of the <i>content<\/i> of the<\/p>\n<p>message or the <i>identity<\/i> of the customer. For example, a telephone<\/p>\n<p>company may not refuse to carry a phone call because of the speakers&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>political views, nor may it charge different fees for different kinds<\/p>\n<p>of speech. A common carrier railroad would have to carry any passenger<\/p>\n<p>from any point A to any point B.<\/p>\n<p>To preserve the common carrier ideal, regulations traditionally prevented<\/p>\n<p>owners of communications systems from providing other services. This was<\/p>\n<p>because firms that provided &quot;content&quot; as well as the &quot;conduit&quot;<\/p>\n<p>would tend to discriminate in favor of their own services. For example,<\/p>\n<p>if the telephone company provided 1-900 services, then it would be tempted<\/p>\n<p>to give its own calls preferential treatment. For similar reasons, cable-TV<\/p>\n<p>providers might give their own channels favored treatment, if they were<\/p>\n<p>allowed to offer programming.<\/p>\n<p>A common carrier telecommunications system is an important base for the<\/p>\n<p>Internet, because it allows digital messages to be transmitted regardless<\/p>\n<p>of their content, thus keeping the Internet uncensored and flexible. But<\/p>\n<p>is a common carrier system a commons? We experience a classic commons<\/p>\n<p>as collective property or as no one&#8217;s property&#151;as &quot;free.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>I do not think that we view telephone lines as common property. If they<\/p>\n<p>resemble a commons, it is for a combination of three reasons: (1) the<\/p>\n<p>common carrier rules; (2) the very low marginal cost of each minute of<\/p>\n<p>use, at least for local calls; and (3) government programs that have brought<\/p>\n<p>telephones into most homes, even in rural and poor urban neighborhoods.<\/p>\n<p>If any of these three conditions were missing, then the telephone system<\/p>\n<p>would not feel like a commons. This is a significant conclusion because<\/p>\n<p>it suggests that three types of regulations are necessary preconditions<\/p>\n<p>of the Internet as we know it. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Some people regard the telephone network as a &quot;commons,&quot; because the telephone companies have been regulated as &quot;common carriers&quot; by the FCC. Today, the Commission simply defines &quot;common carrier&quot; as &quot;the term used to describe a telephone company.&quot; But the underlying idea (which the FCC may have forgotten in this deregulatory era) would apply just [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4180","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-internet-and-public-issues"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4180"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4180\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}