{"id":4127,"date":"2003-01-21T17:11:00","date_gmt":"2003-01-21T17:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4127"},"modified":"2003-01-21T17:11:00","modified_gmt":"2003-01-21T17:11:00","slug":"standardizing-medicine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=4127","title":{"rendered":"standardizing medicine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A bad day for blogging, because I&#8217;m very busy with the technical details<\/p>\n<p>of preparing our joint report with the Carnegie Corporation, the <i>Civic<\/p>\n<p>Mission of Schools<\/i>. Choosing paper stock is not interesting to write<\/p>\n<p>about. I did quickly email the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nlm.nih.gov\/\">National<\/p>\n<p>Library of Medicine <\/a>to ask about the budget and mission statement<\/p>\n<p>for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nlm.nih.gov\/medlineplus\/\">Medline<\/a>. The reason<\/p>\n<p>is that I am supposed to work with some Dutch colleagues on a project<\/p>\n<p>concerning &quot;the reliability of medical information on the Internet.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>(We are funded by the Netherlands government, which is one reason I took<\/p>\n<p>the job.) The tension I hope to explore is between medicine as a standardized<\/p>\n<p>discipline and the Internet as a wide-open medium. Medicine has been standardized<\/p>\n<p>because there is supposed to be &quot;one best treatment&quot; for a given<\/p>\n<p>condition (when fully described), based on the best scientific evidence<\/p>\n<p>available at the time. Although physicians still have great discretion<\/p>\n<p>and often offer divergent advice, powerful forces work to standardize<\/p>\n<p>medicine. It is illegal to practice medicine without a license or to use<\/p>\n<p>or sell regulated drugs without a prescription. To gain a medical license,<\/p>\n<p>one must pass through an elaborate training and socialization process,<\/p>\n<p>including graduation from an accredited medical school and apprenticeship<\/p>\n<p>under experienced physicians. One then bears marks of membership in an<\/p>\n<p>exclusive body: diplomas on the office wall, a white lab coat, an expectation<\/p>\n<p>that one is to be addressed as &quot;doctor.&quot; The Internet, poses<\/p>\n<p>a threat&#151;not only to these professional prerogatives&#151;but also<\/p>\n<p>to the &quot;one best treatment&quot; ideal. Someone who wants to locate<\/p>\n<p>medical information or advice online can easily find herself looking at<\/p>\n<p>a mix of official recommendations and highly eccentric ideas promoted<\/p>\n<p>by laypeople. It is considerably harder to tell the difference between<\/p>\n<p>official and unofficial advice than it was in the old days, when the main<\/p>\n<p>sources of information were people in white coats and refereed journals.<\/p>\n<p>In response, the National Library of Medicine, a $250 million\/year federal<\/p>\n<p>agency, has created a single Website that lays out the &quot;one best<\/p>\n<p>treatments.&quot; I am going to try to assess the result. To put my basic<\/p>\n<p>question boldly: should we hope that everyone who goes online for medical<\/p>\n<p>advice goes to Medline? If yes, what policies can the government adopt<\/p>\n<p>to channel people there? If no, why not?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A bad day for blogging, because I&#8217;m very busy with the technical details of preparing our joint report with the Carnegie Corporation, the Civic Mission of Schools. Choosing paper stock is not interesting to write about. I did quickly email the National Library of Medicine to ask about the budget and mission statement for Medline. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-internet-and-public-issues"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4127"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4127\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}