{"id":23033,"date":"2020-07-14T11:15:57","date_gmt":"2020-07-14T15:15:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=23033"},"modified":"2020-07-14T11:15:58","modified_gmt":"2020-07-14T15:15:58","slug":"there-has-been-no-decrease-in-toleration-of-differences","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=23033","title":{"rendered":"there has been no decrease in toleration of differences"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><a href=\"https:\/\/harpers.org\/a-letter-on-justice-and-open-debate\/\">The Harper&#8217;s Letter<\/a><\/em> decries &#8220;A new set of moral attitudes and political commitments that tend to weaken our norms of open debate and toleration of differences in favor of ideological conformity.&#8221; <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If the Letter is reasonable at all, such claims must be testable. I think that someone who fully endorses the Letter should hypothesize that Americans have&#8211;for better <em>or<\/em> worse&#8211;grown less likely to tolerate hateful speech, such as explicit expressions of anti-Black racism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Have they? Since 1976, the General Social Survey has asked Americans whether someone should be allowed to give an anti-Black racist speech in their community. There is no significant change in responses to this item. It is true that the lowest rate was measured in the most recent year: 2018. But the difference between 2018 and the average year was within the margin of error (+\/- 2.6 points), and the line has long wobbled around the mean. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"641\" src=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.30-AM-1024x641.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-23050\" srcset=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.30-AM-1024x641.png 1024w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.30-AM-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.30-AM-768x481.png 768w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.30-AM-624x390.png 624w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.30-AM.png 1074w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Maybe the <em>left<\/em> has forgotten about the First Amendment? Here is the trend for people who identify on the left end (1 or 2) of a 7-point ideology scale:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"663\" src=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.37-AM-1024x663.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-23049\" srcset=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.37-AM-1024x663.png 1024w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.37-AM-300x194.png 300w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.37-AM-768x497.png 768w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.37-AM-624x404.png 624w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.37-AM.png 1060w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Liberals (as the survey names this group) have been a bit more likely than the population as a whole to think that a racist speech should be allowed (mean = 67.6% vs 61.3% for the whole sample). The only reason this second line wiggles more than the first is that the sample is smaller. The trend is again essentially flat. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Or perhaps it is &#8220;the young&#8221; who have forgotten the First Amendment?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"994\" height=\"686\" src=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.58-AM.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-23048\" srcset=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.58-AM.png 994w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.58-AM-300x207.png 300w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.58-AM-768x530.png 768w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.47.58-AM-624x431.png 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 994px) 100vw, 994px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Maybe, to a limited extent. The third graph shows the trend for people who were 18-29 at the time of each survey. There has not been much change since 1982, but the 2018 result is well below the 1976 number. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By the way, I am not sure that <em>I<\/em> believe a racist speech should be allowed in my community. The First Amendment applies&#8211;there should be no state censorship&#8211;but if my &#8220;community&#8221; is something like my school, religious congregation, university, or town council, I&#8217;m against a sanctioned, formal speech &#8220;claiming that Blacks are inferior&#8221; (which is how the GSS phrases the question).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The GSS has also asked about other forms of speech or speakers: a speaker who is gay, a speech advocating military dictatorship in the USA, a communist speaker, or a Muslim clergyman preaching hatred of the USA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"934\" height=\"690\" src=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.48.05-AM.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-23047\" srcset=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.48.05-AM.png 934w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.48.05-AM-300x222.png 300w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.48.05-AM-768x567.png 768w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-14-at-10.48.05-AM-624x461.png 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 934px) 100vw, 934px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Generally, the trends are up. I find it troubling that ten percent still don&#8217;t want to permit a person who is gay to speak in their community. I also find the level of tolerance for the Muslim clergy-person worrying, although the question is worded in a particular way that&#8217;s arguably Islamaphobic itself.  But overall, the trend is that more people would tolerate more differences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Of course, another trend is taking place&#8211;albeit harder to quantify. Nowadays, an incident that reinforces the beliefs or concerns of a given group can easily &#8220;go viral.&#8221; Given our tendency to confirmation bias, we can select and share news items that confirm almost any belief. Incidents that are widely shared represent severe selection bias. I have read about true stories of problematic (or even scandalous) intolerance on the left. I see no evidence that these stories are common or becoming more so. Absent empirical evidence, can we avoid making sweeping empirical claims?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">See also: <a href=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=23004\">the Harper\u2019s letter is fatally vague<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=21025\">a civic approach to free speech<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=21147\">what sustains free speech?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Harper&#8217;s Letter decries &#8220;A new set of moral attitudes and political commitments that tend to weaken our norms of open debate and toleration of differences in favor of ideological conformity.&#8221; If the Letter is reasonable at all, such claims must be testable. I think that someone who fully endorses the Letter should hypothesize that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23050,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23033"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23033\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23054,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23033\/revisions\/23054"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/23050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}