{"id":18169,"date":"2017-03-10T10:14:15","date_gmt":"2017-03-10T15:14:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=18169"},"modified":"2017-03-10T12:44:17","modified_gmt":"2017-03-10T17:44:17","slug":"microgenetic-ontogenetic-and-sociogenetic-civic-learning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=18169","title":{"rendered":"microgenetic, ontogenetic, and sociogenetic civic learning"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At a\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/ethicsandeducation.wceruw.org\/\">Center for Ethics &amp; Education<\/a>\u00a0conference last week in Kansas City, I learned from <a href=\"https:\/\/gse.berkeley.edu\/people\/larry-nucci\">Larry Nucci<\/a> about an important taxonomy. In my summary:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Microgenetic learning<\/em> means obtaining\u00a0particular knowledge, skills, concepts, values, etc. through particular experiences. A student doesn&#8217;t know about Abe Lincoln, reads a book about him, and knows and remembers the president&#8217;s\u00a0story. That is an example of microgenetic learning. We often measure it with assessments before and after lessons or courses. However, it happens at more precise moments, so it&#8217;s possible to zero in on the learning events and understand the learning mechanisms.<\/li>\n<li><em>Ontogenetic learning<\/em> means\u00a0<em>becoming<\/em> something different. A small child doesn&#8217;t know how to read but becomes literate, a reader. An undergrad doesn&#8217;t know much about medicine but ultimately turns into a skilled, practicing physician. Typically, the timescale of ontogenesis is longer than that of microgenesis, but that&#8217;s not the essential\u00a0difference. In theory, ontogenetic change could happen suddenly, as perhaps for Paul on the road to Damascus. The definition is a\u00a0change in who the person\u00a0<em>is,\u00a0<\/em>not just what he or she knows.<\/li>\n<li><em>Sociogenetic learning<\/em> is change at the level of a community or society. A community is oral and becomes literate, or pagan and becomes Christian, or analog and becomes digital. Such changes\u00a0imply that different ontogenetic learning outcomes will become possible,\u00a0valued, and typical. For instance, a Roman pagan ca. 100 BC couldn&#8217;t learn to be a Christian, but his descendants three\u00a0centuries later could and even had to become Christians. That implied some new microgenetic experiences, like reading scripture and listening to sermons.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These levels of learning can relate in many complex ways. For instance, people can learn specific skills for civic engagement that help them to become activists, and as activists they can change what their society values. Then microgenesis -&gt; ontogenesis -&gt; sociogenesis. Probably more common is the reverse pattern: a society starts to value something, it establishes a new standard of success, and that leads schools to assign new lessons.<\/p>\n<p>This diagram from Saxe 2012 illustrates the various possible pathways.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-18171\" src=\"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2017-03-10-at-9.44.53-AM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"589\" height=\"454\" srcset=\"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2017-03-10-at-9.44.53-AM.png 589w, https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/images\/Screen-Shot-2017-03-10-at-9.44.53-AM-300x231.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 589px) 100vw, 589px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In fields like literacy and STEM education, which have received heavy investment, scholars have given attention to all three domains. However, I perceive a trend toward the microgenetic level in those fields. It&#8217;s increasingly common to apply\u00a0Learning Sciences and Cognitive Sciences to understand how child A learns skill B at\u00a0time C. If that trend comes to dominate, there will be need\u00a0for a critique. We&#8217;ll be at risk of missing the forest for the trees and&#8211;especially&#8211;overlooking what people <em>should<\/em> learn ontogenically to produce a good society.<\/p>\n<p>In civics, which is underfunded and understudied, most of the research is ontogenetic. It&#8217;s most common to use <a href=\"http:\/\/civicyouth.org\/tools-for-practice\/survey-measures-of-civic-engagement\/\">surveys<\/a> to determine whether children or young adults have become\u00a0good citizens of one kind or another, and then ask whether civics courses,\u00a0democratic school climates, or other large influences are related to those outcomes. Practitioners and scholars\u00a0are certainly interested in microgenetic questions, but that\u00a0research is scattered and limited, mostly for lack of resources.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, there is a robust debate about sociogenetic changes in\u00a0civic life. Scholars and pundits debate how the American polity and political culture have changed, what that means for citizens, and how our polity compares to others. Just as an example, Robert Putnam&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=13329\">Bowling Alone<\/a>\u00a0offers\u00a0a sociogenetic thesis: it&#8217;s about how Americans have come to engage more individualistically and less collaboratively since the 1960s. The underlying reasons include changes in technology and the economy (not shifts\u00a0in civic education).<\/p>\n<p>The sociogenetic debate about citizenship still tends to be somewhat disconnected from microgenetic and ontogenetic research. I didn&#8217;t know this vocabulary when Jim Youniss and I edited\u00a0the volume\u00a0<span id=\"productTitle\" class=\"a-size-extra-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Engaging-Young-People-Civic-Life\/dp\/0826516513\">Engaging Young People in Civic Life<\/a>, but our\u00a0explicit goal was to connect debates about civic education to debates about changes in civic life. We thought that developmental psychologists tended to assume that civic life was\u00a0historically constant, and political scientists and sociologists tended to view civic education as historically constant. However,\u00a0regimes and modes of education\u00a0change, and these changes affect each other. It&#8217;s even possible for kids to gain skills through microgenetic civic learning that enable them to change what the society values.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, we need civic education research that combines the microgenetic, ontogenetic, and sociogenetic levels and yields practical advice for practitioners, policymakers, and advocates.<\/p>\n<p>Figure from\u00a0Saxe, G. (2012). Cultural development of mathematical ideas: Papua New Guinea studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. My main source is Larry Nucci (2016) Recovering the role of reasoning in moral education to address inequity and social justice, Journal of Moral Education, 45:3, 291-307, DOI: 10.1080\/03057240.2016.1167027<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At a\u00a0Center for Ethics &amp; Education\u00a0conference last week in Kansas City, I learned from Larry Nucci about an important taxonomy. In my summary: Microgenetic learning means obtaining\u00a0particular knowledge, skills, concepts, values, etc. through particular experiences. A student doesn&#8217;t know about Abe Lincoln, reads a book about him, and knows and remembers the president&#8217;s\u00a0story. That is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,26,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-advocating-civic-education","category-civic-theory","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18169"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18175,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18169\/revisions\/18175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}