{"id":10196,"date":"2012-11-15T10:49:14","date_gmt":"2012-11-15T15:49:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=10196"},"modified":"2012-11-15T13:03:34","modified_gmt":"2012-11-15T18:03:34","slug":"jack-gilbert-a-brief-for-the-defense","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=10196","title":{"rendered":"Jack Gilbert, A Brief for the Defense"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The poet Jack Gilbert died this week. One of his most famous poems is &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.smith.edu\/poetrycenter\/poets\/abrief.html\">A Brief for the Defense<\/a>,&#8221; from which I quote a couple of excerpts:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Sorrow everywhere. Slaughter everywhere. If babies<br \/>\nare not starving someplace, they are starving<br \/>\nsomewhere else. With flies in their nostrils.<br \/>\nBut we enjoy our lives because that&#8217;s what God wants.<br \/>\nOtherwise the mornings before summer dawn would not<br \/>\nbe made so fine. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>If we deny our happiness, resist our satisfaction,<br \/>\nwe lessen the importance of their deprivation.<br \/>\nWe must risk delight. We can do without pleasure,<br \/>\nbut not delight. Not enjoyment. We must have<br \/>\nthe stubbornness to accept our gladness in the ruthless<br \/>\nfurnace of this world. To make injustice the only<br \/>\nmeasure of our attention is to praise the Devil.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The charge against us is that we enjoy life despite others&#8217; suffering. Does the defense (quoted above) make a good case on our behalf? Does it depend on the mention of God? Or is there a secular, ethical case for relishing life despite suffering?<\/p>\n<p>Some years ago, I would have said that the best way to live is not to count one&#8217;s own happiness more than anyone else&#8217;s. My welfare or happiness should (ideally) represent about one seven-billionth of my concern. Now I am not so sure. I think that subjective happiness is only roughly correlated with objective conditions, such as prosperity and freedom. As Gilbert puts it in this poem, &#8220;There is laughter \/ every day in the terrible streets of Calcutta.&#8221; On the other hand, people are generally bad at being happy, we cannot make each other happy, and a world in which we all strove for each other&#8217;s happiness would be strangely empty. Everyone would be taking in other people&#8217;s laundry. Emerson and Nietzsche put the point too strongly, but they has an insight. Not only demanding justice for others but also achieving happiness for ourselves is a worthy moral objective. (See also my posts on &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=9724\">all that matters is equanimity, community, and truth<\/a>,&#8221; &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=8570\">unhappiness and injustice are different problems,&#8221; <\/a>and &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/?p=7896\">Mill\u2019s question: If you achieved justice, would you be happy?<\/a>.&#8221;)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The poet Jack Gilbert died this week. One of his most famous poems is &#8220;A Brief for the Defense,&#8221; from which I quote a couple of excerpts: Sorrow everywhere. Slaughter everywhere. If babies are not starving someplace, they are starving somewhere else. With flies in their nostrils. But we enjoy our lives because that&#8217;s what [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notes-on-poems","category-populism"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10196"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10196\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10213,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10196\/revisions\/10213"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterlevine.ws\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}