a strong good government program

It

appears that John Podesta will lead a new American Majority Institute designed

to develop and popularize "progressive" ideas. (The

New York Times story is here.) I think this is great news, even from

a non-partisan and non-ideological perspective, because the

intellectual collapse of the American Left is reducing competition and debate

in US politics.

There are some good idea for broad political movements

that could be adopted by the Left. Here’s one (more will follow in future postings):

Idea

# 1: A strong "good government" program. To attract the Perot-McCain-Bradley

vote in addition to its usual base, either party could propose the following policies:

  • Public financing (or at least free broadcast time) for political candidates

    and parties. Politicians always circumvent limits on campaign spending, but direct

    subsidies can make politics accessible to newcomers and increase competition.

    Public financing is available now in several states and major cities.

  • Radical

    tax simplification. On a revenue-neutral basis, taxes could be dramatically simplified

    so that the tax form became a single page for everyone. The fairness of the system

    would improve dramatically if this were done right.

  • Alternatives to standard

    methods of federal regulation. Administrative agencies generate malleable, complex,

    and inconsistent bodies of law that are always full of loopholes and inefficiencies

    and impossible to understand. Agencies always get "captured" by special

    interests. In each field, there are alternatives to rule-making by administrative

    agencies. Sometimes, Congress can replace an elaborate system of rules with vouchers

    or other simple payments to consumers. Sometimes, Congress can codify the important

    parts of a body of existing regulations into a sweeping new statute. And sometimes,

    administrative agencies can use new methods of rule-making, such as citizen juries

    or Deliberative Polls.

    The overall theme would be a criticism of both regulation and unregulated

    corporate behavior.

  • Aggressive efforts to promote diversity, competition,

    and localism in the news media, including support for low-powered radio; aggressive

    antitrust enforcement in the media industry; higher subsides for public television

    and radio; and laws requiring providers of Internet connections to offer neutral

    services so that their customers may freely explore the World Wide Web and easily

    post their own material.

  • More federal support for civic

    education and voluntary service, to increase the capacity of the next generation

    to play an active role in politics and community life.