syllabus of an undergraduate course on civic studies

An Introduction to Civic Studies: Theories for a Better World

Overview: “Civic studies” is a nascent discipline that looks at social problems from the perspective of a citizen and asks tough questions about what we should do, taking into account values (ethics), facts (empirical evidence), and strategies. It originated with a joint statement written by a distinguished group of scholars in 2008. Since then, it has produced a special issue of a journal, an annual conference, a book, and–most importantly–the annual Summer Institute of Civic Studies at Tufts. The Summer Institute has drawn about 100 graduate students, leaders, and professors from Bhutan, Singapore, China, Mexico, South Africa, and numerous other countries and backgrounds. This course will be the first-ever undergraduate version of the Summer Institute. We will contribute to building “civic studies.”

Thursday, 1/16 Oriqentation and Inspirations

Introductions, overview of the syllabus and purpose of the course.

Special homework: do an initial “map” of your own moral worldview (See “assignments” for instructions). Results due via email before class on 1/21.

Tuesday 1/21 Theorist #1: Jürgen Habermas (citizen as deliberator)

Readings

Thursday 1/23 application: experiencing a practical deliberation

Special homework: In addition to the reading, watch the very short video from the National Issues Forums.

Reading:

In-class deliberation using this issue guide

Tuesday, 1/28 application: do Americans deliberate?

Reading:

Discussion of the students’ moral maps.

Thursday, 1/30 Application: designing practical deliberations

Reading:

Tuesday, 2/4 Theorist #2: Elinor Ostrom (the citizen as a manager of public goods)

Readings: Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons, pp. 1-102

Play a “Tragedy of the Commons” game in class. Discuss it.

Thursday, 2/6 Theorist #2: Elinor Ostrom (continued)

Reading:

  • Elinor Ostrom’s Nobel Prize Lecture (text or video–your choice).

Tuesday, 2/11 application: designing and managing large-scale commons

Readings:

Thursday, 2/13 Theorist #3: Robert Putnam (the citizen as a group member)

Reading:

(In class, also discuss Sean Safford’s argument, not assigned.)

Tuesday, 2/18 Theorist #3: Robert Putnam (continued)

Reading:

  • Jean L. Cohen, “American Civil Society Talk,” in Robert K. Fullinwider, ed., Civil Society, Democracy, and Civic Renewal, pp. 55-85

Special homework: do a revised “map” of your own moral worldview. Results due by 2/25

Thursday, 2/20 – No class, Monday schedule

Tuesday, 2/25 Theorist # 4: Saul Alinksy (the citizen as an organizer)

Reading:

In class: do one-on-ones

Second mapping exercise is due.

Thursday, 2/27 Application: modern community organizing

Reading:

Tuesday, 3/4 Theorist #5: Harry Boyte (the citizen as a public worker)

Reading:

Thursday, 3/6 application: democratic professionalism

Reading:

Tuesday, 3/11 Theorist #6: John Dewey (the citizen as co-learner?)

Reading:

Thursday, 3/13: midterm in class

Tuesday, 3/18 and Thursday, 3/20 – No class, spring break

Tuesday, 3/25 application: civic education

Readings:

Thursday, 3/27 application: civic media

Reading:

  • Knight Foundation, “Informing Communities: Sustaining Democracy in the Digital Age”

Tuesday, 4/1,Theorist #6: Mohandas K. Gandhi (the citizen as a bearer of soul-force)

Readings:

Thursday, 4/3 – application: nonviolent social movements

Readings:

Tuesday, 4/8 – Session on Power

Readings:

In class, look at the Power Cube

Thursday, 4/10 Theorist #7: James Madison (the citizen as designer or preserver of a republic)

Readings:

Tuesday, 4/15 application: revising the American republic

Reading:

During class, in small groups, design constitutional reforms that would serve Madison’s purposes in the modern republic

Homework: paper due

Thursday, 4/17 Theorist #8: Roberto Mangabeira Unger (the citizen as radical experimentalist)

Reading:

Special homework: revise the moral network map again. Results due by 4/22.

Tuesday, 4/22 application: radical democratic experiments (and some cautionary notes)

Readings:

Final mapping exercise is due.

Thursday, 4/24 summing up and thinking ahead

Reading:

discuss the final network maps

This entry was posted in civic theory on by .

About Peter

Associate Dean for Research and the Lincoln Filene Professor of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Tufts University's Tisch College of Civic Life. Concerned about civic education, civic engagement, and democratic reform in the United States and elsewhere.

3 thoughts on “syllabus of an undergraduate course on civic studies

  1. Andrea Morisette Grazzini

    Exciting to see, Peter.

    Brings me back to around 2009-10 when I embarked on an independent study’ (with self-designed program and syllabus) in civic engagement at Augsburg College in St. Paul. My kluged-together program, under advisement of Harry Boyte, helped ground my nascent instincts in theory and practice.

    This led to my own rookie theory on ‘Constructivism,’ which came to me while developing and doing the coursework and which I’ve built on since.

    In fact, the participatory work I did in my studies is continually iterated. As planned. In lieu of producing papers only Harry and I would see, which seemed almost ridiculously backward to me, my program required I publish at least some of the key themes publicly, as well. It seemed such an ironic waste to engage in ‘private’ civic studies — especially without public practice of civic engagement!

    As example, here’s a few essays I published back then that feature some of my Constructivist ideas:

    http://dynamicshift.org/archives/follow-the-student-leaders-for-fun-democracy

    http://dynamicshift.org/archives/how-to-prove-democracy-is-possible

    http://dynamicshift.org/archives/act-like-a-tree

    Now Constructivism is the orienting architecture for WetheP, Inc. (http://wethepinc.com), which catalyzes, supports, networks and amplifies the efforts of change agents ‘from tips to roots.’

    Looking at your syllabus makes me nostalgic for my humble little attempt at the same. I’ve got my hands pretty full now, but will nonetheless try to weave in a bit of vicarious studies to revive my truncated start, and in solidarity with your students — and with gratitude for your sharing this ‘gem’ of a resource publicly, so people like I could engage with it!

    Andrea Morisette Grazzini
    Founder & CEO WetheP, Inc. (http://wethep.org)
    Founder DynamicShift (http://dynamicshift.org)

Leave a Reply