Salt Lake City: I gave the keynote luncheon address today at the International
Service-Learning Research Conference. I argued that we need research
to test whether service-learning (i.e., combinations of community service
with academic study) works as well or better than competing approaches
to civic education. The best way to prove causality is an experiment
in which students are randomly assigned to the "treatment"
(here, service-learning) or to a control group, and then the two groups
are compared. That’s the "gold standard," although there are
ways to approximate random selection if it proves to be impossible.
There has never been anything like a random experiment to test whether
(or how well) service-learning works as civic education.