- Facebook1.1K
- Threads
- Bluesky
- Total 1.1K
Participatory Budgeting means asking deliberative groups of citizens to decide how to invest public money. It began in Brazil, when (as I understand the story) the Workers’ Party finally took over after years of military dictatorship. They had promised amazing benefits for all but couldn’t afford their promises, so they created a more democratic process for allocating capital budgets. The process saved their popularity and has survived when conservative parties have rotated into office. It has been found to promote equity and efficiency as well as civic engagement.
Certain elected officials in the US have begun using PB to allocate their own discretionary budgets. Those include Chicago Alderman Joe Moore and New York City Councilperson Brad Lander. PB is being used in a few whole municipalities as well. Gabriel Hetland and Abigail N. Martin report in The Nation that Occupy Wall Street participants have been debating, and in some cases, advocating PB as a way of bringing “participatory democracy inside” the government. The advocates have formed the Community Democracy Project (CDP) to advance PB. The critics, however, are “deeply skeptical of anything that smacks of cooperation with the state.” (Back to the Sixties, anyone?)
At KF, we’ve been working with the National Association of
State Budget Officers, which is experimenting with using the results of public
deliberation to make decisions and do their work. I have been doing my best, actually, to keep the work that we’re doing
separate and isolated from the “participatory budgeting” movement. Our
work deals with the problem behind the problem, not the budget per se. Indeed,
I’m trying to move us away from the tendency to focus on the budget, step
back, and think about how to better understand what citizens value and how
those values are in tension. The outcomes of this (read: Deliberation)
should/could translate into assisting policymakers with budget decisions. I
don’t think the participatory budgeting folks take this approach, in fact,
far from it if my understanding is correct. Anyway, just thought you might be
interested in a different approach…
Phil, That sounds really interesting and important, although I do also like that PB gives citizens RIGHTS to participate.
Peter, will you be at the PB Conference in New York City next week?
I mean this week, March 30/31.
Tim, I’m not going but would be glad to hear about it after.