Monthly Archives: September 2008

public opinion about “community organizing”

(Washington, DC) Sarah Palin and Rudy Guiliani used the phrase “community organizer” as an epithet at the Republican National Convention, evidently hoping that many Americans would associate the phrase with leftists (or perhaps with urban minorities). I think this was a mistake. In the 2008 Civic Health Index (pdf), we had asked respondents to offer any words that came to mind when they heard the phrase “community organizing” (along with “service,” “democracy,” “citizenship,” and several others).

The most common category of responses to “community organizing” (at 31%) involved helping others locally. These responses suggested that the respondents basically identified community organizing with volunteering or charity, although sometimes there was an emphasis on the process of being organized (e.g., “group of people getting together for one cause”). Older respondents were less likely to mention helping behaviors. Twenty-one percent said they did not know what this phrase meant. Ten percent gave a vague positive response (“good,” “important”) and five percent offered a vague negative answer (“opinionated,” “pushy,” or “waste of time”). Almost 6% mentioned a particular community organization such as the YMCA, labor unions, or a neighborhood watch. A total of about 5% either cited political activity or the government in some way. When the survey was conducted in July, only seven individuals out of almost 700 respondents mentioned Barack Obama, who had worked as a community organizer.

an exciting day for CIRCLE

(Madison, WI) I wrote this on Sunday in preparation for an exciting day at the National Archives and the Newseum in Washington, DC.

First, at the Archives, the National Conference on Citizenship will release its 2008 national survey of Americans’ Civic Health, which includes questions about public support for policies that would encourage citizen participation. A whole “civic policy agenda” emerges from the survey data. CIRCLE designed and led the analysis of the survey. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and others will speak on the program at the Archives. Check out NCOC.net for the survey results.

Second, in the same venue, the Corporation for National and Community Service will announce a set of new grants. CIRCLE won several of these. We received $570,000 to build (and study) a new online social network for college students in the Boston area. Students will conduct community research, discuss, compete, and thereby strengthen their service and activism. We were also asked to serve as the lead evaluator for a whole group of new grantees who are working on social networking projects. And we received a separate grant to analyze national data on volunteering and other forms of engagement.

Third, the National Conference on Citizenship will hold a kind of mini-conference on how to carry civic engagement past Election Day, with many experts and leaders around the table to discuss strategy.

I’ll be blogging about the Boston social network, the survey data, new strategic ideas, and other substantive matters in the weeks to come.

time to get an economic message

My mentor and former boss Bill Galston has a sharply worded message for Barack Obama: “You are in danger of squandering an election most of us thought was unlosable. The reason is simple: on the electorate’s most important concern – the economy — you have no clear message, and John McCain has filled the void with his own.” Bill adds that Obama needs a tight diagnosis of the current fiasco plus a “focused, parsimonious list of remedies.”

I think voters have plenty of reasons to oppose the Republican ticket in 2008. Therefore, it doesn’t matter much whether Americans know about McCain’s changes of position or Palin’s tanning bed (or McCain’s lobbyist advisers and Palin’s ethics investigation). Nor will the election be affected much by my favorite issues–service, civic engagement, and political reform. It all boils down to what people think Obama would do about the economy.

how to honor Constitution Day

Yesterday was Constitution Day. It’s so named because it marks the anniversary of the signing of the US Constitution in 1787. It’s certainly an auspicious date. Since 2005, every educational institution in America that receives federal funding–from a kindergarten to a graduate school–must observe Constitution Day by providing some kind of educational program about the Constitution. Apparently, the legislation that created this obligation (an amendment to the 2004 omnibus spending bill introduced by Senator Robert Byrd) is constitutional (pdf). That means that no court should strike it down. Nevertheless, I think students could profitably observe Constitution Day by asking:

  • How, under our Constitution, can legislation be passed on the sole prerogative of one US Senator?
  • How can Congress pass legislation without hearings or debate?
  • Is it a constructive and appropriate use of federal power to determine the content and timing of educational instruction?

the civic potential of video games

Many adults who care about civic and ethical education are hostile to video games. We assume that gaming is a solitary, passive, violent activity, unrelated to issues in the real world. Actually, games vary enormously; some of the most popular ones are challenging simulations of democracy and social issues. And gaming is not always solitary; sometimes it is a social and cooperative passtime.

According to the most ambitious and careful study to date, “Civic Implications of Video Games,” what matters is not whether or how much kids play video games. The question is which games they play and how they play them.

For example, there are strong positive correlations between playing the Sims and active civic engagement in the real world. This is perhaps not too surprising because the Sims requires active thinking about social issues in a fictional setting. In contrast, Halo is a “first-person shooter” game. The report doesn’t say that it correlates with traditional civic activity, but Halo does involve collaborating with other players online. Those who collaborate with others online are also more engaged in active citizenship. For instance, they are much more likely to talk about elections. Thus even Halo has some civic potential. We need to promote and celebrate the best games, develop more like them, and use them in conjunction with school, community, and family activities.

The whole report is worth careful study. It was written by the Pew Internet and American Life Project in collaboration with the Civic Education Research Group at Mills College.